What is up with these stupid, braided headbands?

Did I miss the fashion 70s-is-back train somewhere on the way to and from the States?

Please explain! I’m dying to know!!!

Oh, and is Mr. Jay married? Check out the ring on his left hand.

And I am looking at London gaining about 10-15 pounds, and I’m surprised!

She looks gorgeous both ways, but I prefer her with a bit of meat on her (right picture).

I would LOVE to see her in a retro look, bright red lips, fascinator, nipped in waist… she’d look incredible.

But as a model… I can see it being a problem, not being able to fit into the sample sizes. :\

Note about the usage of the word “chemicals” on my blog:

To clarify out of respect for chemists and for readers who are really into science (the way I am not), I am not saying “chemicals” to mean EVERYTHING (water, salt, whatever).

I am talking about the kinds of chemicals that are untested for long-term human consumption and usage, that do not feel or seem natural, that are being slathered and put on our bodies, washed down the drains, harming ourselves and animals when we could just as easily switch to a greener alternative.

I am also not trying to turn everyone against man-made chemicals or that I think they’re ALL bad.

I don’t think that at all. Heck, I still wear contacts and need to wash them with that totally chemical solution, don’t I?

I am just becoming more aware of everything, not to mention, more eco-conscious, and you don’t have to do what I’m doing, but this is my blog, so I’m going to (obviously) tell you what I think.

This chemical-free journey is something I have been embarking on since January 1st 2009, and I am finding out a lot of things I am not happy with (be it for the environment, or just for the health of my body in general) and I am sharing on my blog in case you were wondering.

I am also NOT claiming to be a scientist. When I read ingredients, I Google them just to find out what they are, because I can barely even pronounce them, and sometimes I am surprised and other times.. not so much.

The Scoop about:

Thanks to Ginger for favouriting this from Lipstick & Paint in my Google Reader Shared items, I now have an opportunity to tell those of you out there who are starting to be, or trying to be eco-conscious, to be careful about what you read. 

I was SO EXCITED when I heard that they were coming out with something like this.

Then I went to their site.. and what I do want to point out, is that as is with everything companies try to sell us, we should always read the fine print and not take their words for granted.

To get a couple of things out of the way:

1. I am not really into celebrities, but I can see how having a name like Brad Pitt adds cache, especially with his involvement with Angelina Jolie, the do-gooder of the world.

2. I LOVE that the profits are going to “JPF ECO SYSTEMS”, “a charitable partnership created by Kiehl’s and Brad Pitt to maximize awareness of environmental sustainability”.

And I think in theory, it’s a great reason and cause to buy the product.

…But they are playing with the names of the ingredients to mislead customers

If they were going to really raise awareness about the environment, maybe they should have taken a closer look at the ingredients they are putting in the bottle instead.

I feel like what Kiehl’s is trying to market, this 100% eco-friendly, green thing, is a two-faced lie.

The major problem I have with it, is that it is not SLS-free.

What is SLS and why is it bad?

 

Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (or SLS) and Sodium Laureth Sulfate (or SLFS): SLS and SLFS are eye and skin irritants. Infants and children, whose eyes are developing at a more rapid pace than adults, are more susceptible to accumulation of SLS in eye tissues. Exposure to SLS causes improper eye development in children, since it is absorbed systemically through skin. 

SLS is lethal to fresh water fish at 7ppm and does not break down well in the environment.

Materials Safety Data Sheets caution workers to avoid body contact with SLS.

However, this same chemical is actively put into body care and hair products. SLS and SLFS are both found in shampoo’s, toothpaste, dishwashing liquids, soaps, actually, anything that produces a rich and foamy lather.

If this information isn’t enough, research has shown that both of these substances may cause carcinogenic nitrates, NDELA, and dioxins to form when combined with commonly used ingredients in a single bottle of shampoo.

Large amounts of nitrates, aking to eating a full pound of nitrate-laden bacon, would then be assimilated into the body with just one shampooing–(from a 1978 FDA report).

Source: Kids Organics

If you want to read more, Wise Geek posted more about SLS doing nasty things to your body, namely:

Besides subjecting human and animal test subjects to different degrees of discomfort, critics claim that sodium lauryl sulfate is retained in the long run in organ tissues like the heart, liver, and brain. 

In lab animals, testing has been blamed for causing mutagenic effects. If they remain in the eyes for too long, they may also lead to the development of cataracts.

Because sodium lauryl sulfate is corrosive by nature, it can dry out skin by stripping the protective lipids from the surface of the skin, weakening the body’s natural moisture regulation mechanisms. If it eats away at the follicle, hair loss may also be induced.

And yet another site, here from Organic Health Issues about SLS.

Look, aren’t you just being a wee bit paranoid, FB?

Yeah probably.

But didn’t I cross that line a long time ago, with telling you to be careful with your email address, your credit card info, your birthday, Social security or Social insurance numbers, and basic information about yourself on Facebook without setting the proper privacy settings?

I’m paranoid all right. But at least I’m consistent, and I am not turning into some person who thinks the world is one big fat conspiracy. I just want to be safe and healthy, albeit a bit cautious.

It could very well turn out to bite me in the ass, and it ends up that SLS and its derivatives SAVE the environment and have actually increased life expectancy.

But for now, if I can avoid putting that stuff on my body, whether the research out there is real, confirmed or not, then I’m going to do my best to just .. stay natural.

Better safe than sorry.

If anything, I’d like to really do my part to save the delicious, yummy fishes in the ocean, so that we can all continue to eat them and their families for many years to come.

Or, to save other species of fish we love to make movies about, like the real life Nemo look-alikes (clownfishes), to the left.

Won’t you?.. Want to save a Nemo too?

Let’s start with the list of ingredients, shall we?

Again. NOT trying to make you scared of your body cleansers or shampoo bottles, I just am a bit irritated that Kiehl’s is playing with the words in their marketing, parrotting that it is SLS free, when it clearly isn’t — not in the way I had imagined it to be.

The ingredients bolded in red are to me, red flags, and a couple out of that list, ain’t bad but it sure as hell is NOT perfect.

• Aqua/Water
• Sodium Coco-Sulfate (Exactly the same as SLS, as they’re both primarily C-12. See: Beauty Brains)
• Coco-Glucoside (Product obtained by the condensation of coconut alcohol with glucose See: Skin Deep)
• Glycerin (Moisturizing agent)
• Parfum/Fragrance (Fragrances? Generally, they’re considered bad for the environment)
• Citric Acid (Vitamin C)
• Sodium Chloride (Salt)
• Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice (Aloe)
• Sodium Benzoate (white crystalline salt used as a food preservative and antiseptic See: Google)
• Potassium Sorbate (potassium salt of sorbic acid, used as a food preservative, and in wine See: Google)
• Citronellol (Hazard Rating: 3, irritation, toxicity.. See: Skin Deep)
• Geraniol (Terpene Alcohol. Hazard Rating: 5, neurotoxicity, irritant, added in food See: Skin Deep)
• Isoeugenol (Hazard Rating: 7, possible cause of cancer, mutagenic, endocrine disruption… See: Skin Deep)
• Sodium Citrate Fmla (salt of sodium and citric acid; used primarily as a food additive See: Google)

THE GOOD NEWS…

… is that at least it’s a step in the right direction, free of parabens at least.

And they ARE more eco-friendly than other products, like the bottle for example is made out of eco-friendly stuff, bla bla bla… but it cannot claim to be 100% green.

But based on the other ingredients, it doesn’t sound like it’s good for your body in any way.

I do find that as a general rule, the smaller the ingredient list, the healthier and more natural it is likely to be.

Some of those ingredients are probably in VERY small doses (being near the end of the label), but I am not willing to take a chance on it being so small it doesn’t harm my body over 40+ years of using it.

I’d rather just avoid it.

BUT THE BAD NEWS…

…. is their marketing hype about the environment, how it’s SLS free, when they are just using that word in its purest form to mean: Sodium Laurel Sulfate free.

But in its place, they have put Coco-Sulfate, which is basically the same thing as SLS.

Maybe they should have also thought about the fact that aside from everything else, even if it WAS safe for the environment with Coco-Sulfate instead, and all of those ingredients help the fish thrive and live….. it may not be safe for human usage in the long term?

Food.. er.. Body wash for thought.

SO WHAT TO DO?

If you must buy a body wash, I guess this is the best of the SLS’s. They say that Coco-Sulfate is a gentler derivative, gentler than SLS.

But if you wanted to truly avoid SLS in its entirety and all of this fancy forms, then.. this product is not for you.

BUT LET ME PROPOSE SOMETHING RADICAL

You should also consider that body wash may not be necessary. 

I’m going to admit right here that I don’t use it at all, even before I got on this eco-friendly thing, and no one could tell. LOL

If you already use shampoo, just use the suds off that.

If you don’t use shampoo and are water only like me, then having a wash cloth and rubbing your skin gently under the water, is good enough to get rid of any body dirt or smells.

Or if you must use soap, use truly green soap, made simply with fat and salt (Kiss my face has a good brand, that unfragranced olive oil soap is really the simplest, greenest soap style you can buy).

It WILL be harsh on your skin however, as is most soaps.

And all that will be left is .. your smell.

Your natural, not BO-stanky, normal, human smell. We don’t all have to smell like coconuts, mangoes or flowers if we don’t want to, and choose not to.

Sometimes, just smelling like ourselves is fine.

AGAIN..

I want to stress that I am not advocating you throw out every shampoo and cleanser bottle you’ve got in the house. In no way am I saying you should do that.

I’m just saying, don’t get sucked in by the hype about it being eco-friendly so quickly.

Be a critical consumer, and do a quick Google, do some research and make your own decisions about whether or not it’s a good product to buy based on your beliefs.

For me, it’s a big fat no. But to you, it may be the best thing you’ve found out there!

And I encourage that, considering it is a greener product overall, than some body wash cleansers I’ve read the labels of in drugstores.

I just don’t like that they are playing with the words. Technically, there is no SLS in there. But there are SLS-like properties, which.. is the same thing to me, in the end.

It’s been a long time coming. I am making a new pact to go through everything I own (tupperware, wardrobe brands, electronics and products I use) and reviewing them thoroughly so that I pass on my horrible experiences and you don’t have to waste money on something I did.

This is a review of my almost 4-5 year old camera called the Fuji Finepix Z1 Digital Camera.

Why are you reviewing an old camera, FB?

I am not going to spend a lot of time on it, because it IS fairly outdated, but just in case some of you may end up wanting to pick up the camera for a song but are hesitating, here’s my no-holds barred review.

There ARE newer versions out, so don’t be disassuaded

I should mention that they have a lot of newer versions of this Finepix out that I have no reviewed. Hello? Fuji? Can you send me a couple to review from a real non-professional photographer’s point of view for free?

Basic Specs, please!

Memory card included: XD Olympus 512MB. It holds a LOT of photographs and I never ran into my limit until I travelled to NYC and starting snapping pictures of everything that moved.

This sucked and still sucks for me because my Dell laptop and my HP Mini Netbook only takes SD cards, and not the smaller, supposedly superior XD cards. Whatevs.

Megapixel: 5 MP (I say if you can afford it, a camera with 10 MP is the ultimate, and the highest you should consider going. Anything higher than 10MP and you better be blowing up those shots on huge frames)

Weight: 140g (very light, the weight of a Blackberry)

Size: Like a deck of cards. Literally.

More specs can be googled, or found here.

Looks 9/10

It’s pretty darn cute. Super slim and the reason why I bought it (I wanted a slimmer, not so bulky camera to tote along)

I docked a point for not having cute colours.

Camera wear & Tear 10/10

After 4-5 years, I guess there’s something to be said about how long my Finepix had lasted in terms of durability.

Nothing broke, which is incredible because I am a hard person on my stuff.

Even the screen stayed scratch free, as it is a GLASS screen, and not a screen you can dig your finger into and leave marks all over.

The on/off button and cover for the camera also didn’t break.

See, the camera also opens with a single hand movement by bringing the cover of the camera down with one finger and I would expect that part to break first because of how many times I am opening and closing it.

This feature worked fabulously when you are on the way, and you just want a quick snap, but don’t want to fiddle with finding the ON/OFF button. I will miss this feature the most in all the subsequent cameras I will ever buy.

Li-Ion Battery Wear & Tear 5/10

I guess I can’t expect all batteries to last forever.

But this one charges, and then dies within half a day of touring the city, turning it on and off, zooming and snapping pictures.

It used to last the whole day.

You can replace it if you wish, but getting the damn thing out is a feat in itself. You have to remove the little XD card, then shake the camera until the battery falls out.

Quality of photos & video?

Not bad. I mean, it’s not professional. But even by regular standards (now), they suck. Most cameras in the price range I paid for this camera 4 years ago, are at least 8MP on today’s market. I paid around $400 CAD I think?

I do notice a difference even posting pictures in general because they tend to look kind of blurry and very pixel-y. Very fuzzy.

This is because it is a 5MP camera, with very low zoom (the zoom is actually a fake digital zoom, not the REAL camera or optical zoom) so it sucks butt.

The difference between digital and optical zoom is that the digital zoom is what I consider to be a fake zoom and easily replicated in Photoshop, as it just zooms in on a part of a scene or picture, but keeps the same amount of pixels.

Optical zoom however is the real zoom everyone should look out for. The camera is REALLY zooming in on the subject and you will see a little lens pop out of the camera as a result.

With that being said, it was good enough for regular every day use.

I even forgot it had video capabilities. I could have been video blogging all of this time!

Charging it

This is what I truly, truly, TRULY hated about this camera. (Can you tell?)

To charge it, you MUST use the dock it comes in.

You put the camera on the dock, plug it in and let it charge. If the camera moves JUST SLIGHTLY off the dock on an angle, it stops charging.

So annoying. And you have to pack so many things – the dock, the cable, the transfer cord.. drives me mad.

And to move the pictures off my camera, I must again, put it on a dock and plug it into my computer to get it to read — but to be fair, this is more of a laptop problem than the camera, but still… since it’s an XD card, I can’t just pop it into the SD-only reader on my laptops.

General Everyday Use?

If you have littler fingers, this is a great camera for you. If you have man hands, fuggedaboudit. Go buy a real camera.

Menus

Very, VERY easy to use. The W/T button at the top is very easy to use. The other buttons are few, and far between (simple is best) and I never found a problem with knowing which button was to turn off the flash etc.

Close to NIL manual adjustments for you photographer-types, no adjusting of aperture or any of that other stuff, which was perfect for me as I don’t care about any of that.

Ease of buttons
Very, VERY easy to use. Turning this thing on and off is a beauty. Literally, one hand is required to open and close the camera, as well as to take a shot.

I loved this, because I’d have the camera open and taking a shot before BF got even 1 in. I was at least 3 seconds ahead of the curve.

Conclusion?

A nice starter camera, or one for younger kids/teens who aren’t picky about picture quality.

It was a nice camera for what it was used for — taking some pics here and there of friends, family, sights.. and a little video once in a while.

But while I think this is a great starter camera, there will come the day that you wish that you had more megapixels (like 8MP) and at least a 3x zoom.

Those are things I compromised on many years ago because of size and price, but nowadays, you can pick up a digital camera around the same size as this (or smaller!) with a lot more features packed into it.

But now they do have the Z3 and all the other subsequent versions of this camera. I really liked it, save for the awful dock thing that drove me mad.

Want to know what else I’ve reviewed?

Check out my FB Features – Technology, or FB Features for all the things I’ve reviewed like books, products.. you name it.